Acute Valve Syndrome in Aortic Stenosis

“These findings are extremely important and complementary to the recently presented EARLY TAVR Trial, published in the NEJM. The absence of symptoms was traditionally considered a sign of relative safety. However, this study shows how frequent acute valve syndrome is in patients undergoing AVR, and how patients would benefit greatly from intervention before symptoms appear.”

Philippe Généreux, MD, FACC Director of the Structural Heart Program at Morristown Medical Center’s Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute and lead author of the study.

AIM

To describe the impact of clinical presentation among patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS & RESULTS

We analyzed a de-identified real-world dataset including patients from 29 US hospitals with appropriate permissions (egnite Database, egnite). Patients >18 years old with moderate or greater AS undergoing AVR were included. Patients were classified in 3 groups according to the acuity and severity of clinical presentation prior to AVR: (i) asymptomatic, (ii) progressive signs and symptoms (progressive valve syndrome [PVS]), and (iii) acute or advanced signs and symptoms (acute valve syndrome [AVS]). Mortality and heart failure hospitalization after AVR were examined with Kaplan–Meier estimates, with results compared using the log-rank test.

Among 2,009,607 patients in our database, 17,838 underwent AVR (78.6% transcatheter AVR, 21.4% surgical AVR). Age was 76.5±9.7 years, and 40.2% were female. Prior to AVR, 2504 (14.0%) were asymptomatic, 6116 (34.3%) presented with PVS, and 9218 (51.7%) presented with AVS. At two years, the estimated rate of mortality for asymptomatic, PVS, and AVS were 5.8% (4.6%-7.0%), 7.6% (6.7%-8.4%), 17.5% (16.5%-18.5%), respectively, and the estimated rate of hospitalization with heart failure for asymptomatic, PVS, and AVS were 11.1% (9.5%-12.6%), 19.0% (17.8%-20.2%), 41.5% (40.2%-42.8%). After adjustment, patients presenting with AVS had increased risk of mortality after AVR (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8-2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

From a large, real-world database of patients undergoing AVR for AS, most patients presented with AVS, which was associated with an increased risk of mortality and heart failure hospitalization.

*This study is part of egnite’s cardiovascular real-world evidence bibliography, which lists all of our peer-reviewed articles, conference abstracts, and patents.

Follow egnite on social:

Related Articles

Press

egnite’s Call for Science Study on M-TEER Device Durability and Long-Term Patient Outcomes to be Featured at TCT 2026

The egnite Registry contributed de-identified, longitudinal data, linking serial echocardiograms with clinical outcomes, to help answer what happens to patients after a successful mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) procedure.  ALISO VIEJO, Calif. — October 13, 2026 — egnite, Inc., a cardiovascular intelligence company that helps clinicians identify and manage patients with untreated heart disease, today announced that Dr. John T. Saxon, Director of the Advanced Cardiac Valve Center at University of Virginia

Publications

Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Impact, and Response to TAVR: Insights From egnite Data

BACKGROUND Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) frequently co-occur, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We examined current US treatment trends and patient outcomes among patients with severe AS and at least moderate MR. METHODS We analyzed data from 2 992 362 patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing 5 245 904 echocardiograms at 43 US institutions

"The future of aortic stenosis care requires proactive identification, longitudinal monitoring, and intentional pipeline management."
egnite Research

Rethinking the Aortic Stenosis Pipeline

Aortic stenosis care is shifting from a reactive to a proactive model. Emerging clinical evidence supports earlier identification, closer monitoring, and intentional patient management across the disease continuum. As treatment thresholds evolve, health systems need scalable approaches to identify at-risk patients, close treatment gaps, and ensure timely access to specialist care.