The Mortality Burden of Untreated Aortic Stenosis

“This research is the first of its kind to look at such a large cohort of AS patients over a four-year span. Findings serve as a stark reminder of the poor prognosis associated with untreated AS irrespective of severity, suggesting patients with moderate AS may benefit from intervention.”

Philippe Généreux, MD, FACC
Director of the Structural Heart Program of Morristown’s Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute and lead author of the study.

BACKGROUND

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend the assessment and grading of severity of aortic stenosis (AS) as mild, moderate, or severe, per echocardiogram, and recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) when the AS is severe.

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to describe mortality rates across the entire spectrum of untreated AS from a contemporary, large, real-world database.

METHODS

We analyzed a deidentified real-world data set including 1,669,536 echocardiographic reports (1,085,850 patients) from 24 U.S. hospitals (egnite Database, egnite, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). Patients >18 years of age were classified by diagnosed AS severity. Untreated mortality and treatment rates were examined with Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates, with results compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate hazards analysis was performed to assess associations with all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 595,120 patients with available AS severity assessment, the KM-estimated 4-year unadjusted, untreated, all-cause mortality associated with AS diagnosis of none, mild, mild-to-moderate, moderate, moderate-tosevere, or severe was 13.5% (95% CI: 13.3%-13.7%), 25.0% (95% CI: 23.8%-26.1%), 29.7% (95% CI: 26.8%-32.5%), 33.5% (95% CI: 31.0%-35.8%), 45.7% (95% CI: 37.4%-52.8%), and 44.9% (95% CI: 39.9%-49.6%), respectively. Results were similar when adjusted for informative censoring caused by treatment. KM-estimated 4-year observed treatment rates were 0.2% (95% CI: 0.2%-0.2%), 1.0% (95% CI: 0.7%-1.3%), 4.2% (95% CI: 2.0%-6.3%), 11.4% (95% CI: 9.5%-13.3%), 36.7% (95% CI: 31.8%-41.2%), and 60.7% (95% CI: 58.0%-63.3%), respectively. After adjustment, all degrees of AS severity were associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AS have high mortality risk across all levels of untreated AS severity. Aortic valve replacement rates remain low for patients with severe AS, suggesting that more research is needed to understand barriers to diagnosis and appropriate approach and timing for aortic valve replacement.

Généreux P, Sharma RP, Cubeddu RJ, Aaron L, Abdelfattah OM, Koulogiannis KP, Marcoff L, Naguib M, Kapadia SR, Makkar RJ, Thourani VH, van Boxtel BS, Cohen DJ, Dobbles M, Barnhart GR, Kwon M, Pibarot P, Leon MB, Gillam LD. The mortality burden of untreated aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 82(22):2101–2109. doi10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.796​

Follow egnite on social:

Related Articles

egnite Research

Cath Lab Capacity is Up—But Structural Heart Procedures Are Being Outpaced by Other Interventions

Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for more than half of all heart failure cases and carries significant morbidity and mortality risk, especially after hospitalization1. Historically, management of the disease is largely focused on comorbidity management and lifestyle modifications, given that available therapies had not demonstrated sufficient impact on hospitalization burden or mortality. In recent years, however, the treatment paradigm for HFpEF has shifted, with a growing emphasis on SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Originally developed to lower blood glucose levels in diabetic patients, several clinical trials have firmly established that SGLT2i is also beneficial for patients living with HFpEF2.

egnite Research

From Black Box to Breakthrough: Unlocking Hidden Care Patterns with LLM-Enriched Data

Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for more than half of all heart failure cases and carries significant morbidity and mortality risk, especially after hospitalization1. Historically, management of the disease is largely focused on comorbidity management and lifestyle modifications, given that available therapies had not demonstrated sufficient impact on hospitalization burden or mortality. In recent years, however, the treatment paradigm for HFpEF has shifted, with a growing emphasis on SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Originally developed to lower blood glucose levels in diabetic patients, several clinical trials have firmly established that SGLT2i is also beneficial for patients living with HFpEF2.